Concept↦Safety↦Safety in Studies↦Risk-Benefit Ratio
Was betrifft es? Warum ist das wichtig?
In a study, the risk-benefit ratio is the proportion of all possible risks over anticipated benefits. Its assessment serves to mitigate potential risks in order to protect study participants.
Each study carries its own risks and benefits. Still, it must be minimised as far as possible to guarantee risks remain acceptable to participants.
The risk-benefit ratio of a study:
- Must be positive for the study to be approved (study benefits are higher than risks). The Ethics Committee (EC) and RA (e.g. Swismedic, international) only authorise studies where benefits are judged greater than risks
- Is continuously assessed during study conduct. This ensures that the ratio remains unchanged. In the event of an unfavourable shift, additional risk-control measures must be implemented. If this is not possible, the study is stopped
It is the responsibility of the SP-INV to assess the risk-benefit ration of the study. By assessing risks, risk control-measures can be implemented.
Mehr
Based on submitted documents by study researchers.
EC is responsible to review and approve any expected study risks based on:
- Submitted study documents
- The ratio between the likely risks and burdens and the expected benefits to participants
- Measures taken by the SP-INV / Site-INV to minimise risks and burdens
Swissmedic is responsible to:
- Review safety and quality of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP), Investigational Medial Device (IMD)
- Reflect the current state of scientific knowledge based on the information provided in the Investigator Brochure (IB)
- Ensure that IMP/IMD risk-control measures are taken into account by the SP-INV
- Ensure risks, benefits, including risk-control measures are correctly reported in the study protocol
The expected level of risk depends on the:
- IMP/IMD under investigation
- The type of intervention or study design (e.g. placebo controlled, randomised, single arm)
- Study phase or product development (First-in-man, phase I, II and III for IMP / MP post-marketing stage or pilot / pivotal stage for IMD / IMD for post-marketing stage)
- Disease and current health status of participants (e.g. risk for severe AEs in multimorbid participants may be more acceptable than for healthy volunteers)
- Study population (e.g. pregnant women, children, participants lacking capacity)
Was muss ich befolgen?
As a SP-INV:
- Perform a thorough risk-benefit assessment by reviewing existing safety information (e.g. IB, product information, scientific literature)
- Identify and assess study participant:
- Risks and burdens with regard to the planned Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP) or Investigational Medial Device (IMD) intervention
- Benefits (e.g. prevent progression of disease, improve quality of life)
- Based on the study protocol identify risks that threaten participant relevant Critical to Quality factors, and describe:
- Expected risks and benefits in relation to the study population
- Any applicable warnings and precautions
Describe the risk management of your planned study in a Risk Assessment Form (e.g. risk identification, risk evaluation and prioritisation, risk control measures). As applicable write safety SOPs / WIs, and the establishment of a DSMB needed to evaluate and report risk occurrence during study conduct
As a SP-INV and Site-INV ensure to comply with the Principles of Ethics and be aware of ethical dilemmas faced by researchers.
Mehr
As a SP-INV, select a risk appropriate study design for the population under investigation (e.g. health / disease status, vulnerable population such as children, pregnant women)
Risks for study participants should never be disproportionate to or outweigh any expected benefit. In the event of an unfavourable shift in the risk-benefit ratio for participants:
- Amend the patient information
- Inform study participants
- If applicable, ask the participant to re-consent to study participation
To be considered
- For diseases with a high level of health impairment (e.g. multimorbid participants and cancer patients) a higher risk level is acceptable. However, for conditions with a low level of health impairment (e.g. headache), only low risks would be acceptable
- During study conduct the risk-benefit ratio should be re-assessed on an ongoing basis or at least in the event of safety concerns
Wo kann ich Hilfe anfordern?
Your local Research Support Centre↧ can assist you with experienced staff regarding this topic
Basel, Departement Klinische Forschung (DKF), dkf.unibas.ch
Lugano, Clinical Trials Unit (CTU-EOC), ctueoc.ch
Bern, Department of Clinical Research (DCR), dcr.unibe.ch
Geneva, Clinical Research Center (CRC), crc.hug.ch
Lausanne, Clinical Research Center (CRC), chuv.ch
St. Gallen, Clinical Trials Unit (CTU), h-och.ch
Zürich, Clinical Trials Center (CTC), usz.ch
Documents
References
ICH GCP E6(R3) – see in particular guideline
- 2.7 Participant medical care and safety reporting
- 3.13 Safety assessment and reporting
- Appendix B.9 Assessment of safety
ICH E8(R1) – see in particular guideline
- 4.3.2 Exploratory and confirmatory safety and efficacy studies
Declaration of Helsinki – see in particular principles
- 4, 9, 14 General principles
- 16-18 Risks, burdens and benefits
- 20 Justification of research in vulnerable groups
Swiss Law
HRA – see in particular articles
- Art. 12 Risks and burdens
- Art. 15 Safety and protective measures
ClinO – see in particular articles
- Art. 25 EC review areas
- Art. 32 RA review areas
ClinO-MD – see in particular articles
- Art.11 EC review areas
- Art. 17 RA review areas
HRO – see in particular article
- Art. 15 EC review areas