What is it? Why is it important?

Risk review is an integral part of the study`s risk strategy during study conduct.

 

During risk reviews, risk control-measures are re-evaluated to ensure they remain applicable and effective. The implementation of risk control-measures were initially planed based on threats to the study`s Critical to Quality (CtoQ) factors. (e.g. participant safety and rights, data quality, regulatory (Swiss law) and protocol compliance)

 

Questions to ask during risk reviews:

  • Have all CtoQ factors, in need of risk control-measures, been correctly identified
  • Have risks threatening the study`s CtoQ been correctly identified
  • How effective are the originally planned risk control-measures? Do they need improvement, or must they be replaced? Are measures still relevant with respect to emerging knowledge and expertise?
  • Is there an occurrence of new risks?
  • Have previously identified risks become less relevant?
  • Is study staff properly trained on risk-responsibilities and the implementation of risk control-measures?
  • Has the risk review been properly documented (e.g. in a Risk Assessment Form (RAF))

More

EXAMPLE OF A RISK REVIEW AND ITS RE-EVALUATION PROCESS


Protocol requirement (a CtoQ factor): Lab analysis must be performed on fasting blood samples.

Risk: participants are not fasting

 

1st Risk control-measure: participants are informed at study inclusion regarding fasting state at blood draw

  • 1st Periodic risk review: 25% of participants present with no fasting blood at blood draw
  • 1st Risk re-evaluation and documentation: 25% surpasses predefined tolerance limit of 10%. Risk control-measures must be improved

 

2nd Adaptation of risk control-measures: Participants are reminded by SMS on the evening before blood draw regarding fasting state at blood draw

  • 2nd Periodic risk review: 13% of participants present with no fasting blood at blood draw
  • 2nd Risk re-evaluation and documentation: 13% acceptable with given conditions. Additional risk control-measures are not feasible or too costly if implemented. An evaluation must ensue regarding the need for a protocol amendment

What do I need to do?

As a SP-INV or Site-INV:

  • Based on the risk strategy defined by the SP-INV, implement applicable risk reviews
  • Promote and facilitate the interaction between those implementing risk control-measures, and those deciding on what risk control-measures to implement. Only with a robust feedback-loop can it be guaranteed that risk control-measures remain appropriate and effective
  • Keep vigilance regarding deviations from predefined risk tolerance limits
  • Automatically trigger a risk review:
    • If a risk deviates from a predefined quality tolerance limit
    • After implementing new risk control-measures

 

Tasks during risk reviews include to:

  • Collect staff feedback on implemented risk control-measures (i.e. schedule regular staff meetings focusing on risk management)
  • Discuss and decide, together with risk-responsible staff, whether risk control-measures must be adapted, improved, or even deleted 
  • Review risk tolerance limits, and decide whether they must be adapted?
  • Review and approve the documentation regarding risk reviews. This ensures that the study remains inspection ready (e.g. Swissmedic inspection)

More

The documentation of risk reviews should include:

  • Risk implication and the ongoing effectiveness of risk control-measures, based on emerging knowledge and expertise. Which risk control-measures were effective, and which one did not work?
  • The inclusion and description of newly identified risks and/or CtoQ factors
  • The use and management of automatic triggers (i.e. risk deviation from predefined quality tolerance limits)
  • Information flow between those implementing risk control-measures, and those deciding what control-measures to implement

 

By documenting the study`s ongoing risk management, lessons learned can be used for optimal risk management in subsequent studies.

Where can I get help?

Your local Research Support Centre can assist you with experienced staff regarding this topic

  • Basel, Departement Klinische Forschung (DKF), dkf.unibas.ch

  • Lugano, Clinical Trials Unit (CTU-EOC), ctueoc.ch

  • Bern, Department of Clinical Research (DCR), dcr.unibe.ch

  • Geneva, Clinical Research Center (CRC), crc.hug.ch

  • Lausanne, Clinical Research Center (CRC), chuv.ch

  • St. Gallen, Clinical Trials Unit (CTU), h-och.ch

  • Zürich, Clinical Trials Center (CTC), usz.ch

References

ICH GCP E6(R3) – see in particular guidelines

  • 3.10 Quality management
  • 3.10.1.2 Risk evaluation
  • 3.10.1.5 Risk review

ISO 31000 (access liable to costs) – see in particular section

  • Risk management: Principles and guidelines

Documents

Abbreviations
  • CtoQ – Critical to Quality
  • CTU – Clinical Trials Unit
  • ICH GCP – International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice
  • ISO – International Organization for Standardization
  • QC – Quality Control
  • RAF – Risk Assessment Form
  • Site-INV – Site-Investigator
  • SP-INV – Sponsor-Investigator
Conduct ↦ Quality and Risk ↦ Risk Review ↦ Procedures
Study
Basic

Provides some background knowledge and basic definitions

Basic Monitoring
Concept

Starts with a study idea

Ends after having assessed and evaluated study feasibility

Concept Statistic Methodology
Concept Drug or Device
Development

Starts with confidence that the study is feasible

Ends after having received ethics and regulatory approval

Development Drug or Device
Set-Up

Starts with ethics and regulatory approval

Ends after successful study initiation

Set-Up Ethics and Laws
Set-Up Statistic Methodology
Set-Up Quality and Risk
Set-Up Drug or Device
Conduct

Starts with participant recruitment

Ends after the last participant has completed the last study visit

Conduct Statistic Methodology
Conduct Drug or Device
Completion

Starts with last study visit completed

Ends after study publication and archiving

Completion Drug or Device
Current Path (click to copy): Conduct ↦ Quality and Risk ↦ Risk Review ↦ Procedures