What is it? Why is it important?

Depending on their roles and responsibilities study team members can provide important feedback on the feasibility of a study.

 

Based on the complexity of the study, feedback can inlcude information on:

 

Feedback should be collected from all parties involved, SP-INV team and Site-INV team. 

The SP-INV makes final decision regarding study feasibility and whether to implement a study as planned.

What do I need to do?

As a member of the study team:

  • Read the study protocol, the Investigational Brochure (IB) (if applicalbe), and the questions listed in the feasibility questionnaire
  • In order to support the quality of the study, maintain a Quality by Design (QbyD) approach during the assessment 
  • Assist in the identification of the study`s Critical to Quality (CtoQ) factors, including the identification of risks threatening their integrity (e.g. participant right and safety, data quality)
  • Suggest risk control-measures protecting CtoQ integrity
  • Assess and provide feedback on the study`s feasibility by using a problem-solving approach

 

As a Site-INV:

  • Request support from study team members based on individual expertise.
  • Include risks for an overall evaluation of study feasibility. Include risk experiences under lessons learned from previous studies
  • Forward the feasibility assessment to the SP-INV within the deadline

 

In the event of study implementation, implement a risk-based Quality Management System at the site to ensure the ongoing quality of the study.

Where can I get help?

Your local Research Support Centre can assist you with experienced staff regarding this topic

  • Basel, Departement Klinische Forschung (DKF), dkf.unibas.ch

  • Lugano, Clinical Trials Unit (CTU-EOC), ctueoc.ch

  • Bern, Department of Clinical Research (DCR), dcr.unibe.ch

  • Geneva, Clinical Research Center (CRC), crc.hug.ch

  • Lausanne, Clinical Research Center (CRC), chuv.ch

  • St. Gallen, Clinical Trials Unit (CTU), h-och.ch

  • Zürich, Clinical Trials Center (CTC), usz.ch

References

ICH GCP E6(R3) – see in particular guideline

  • 2.3 Responsibilities
  • 3.10 Quality management

ICH E8(R1) – see in particular

  • 3.1 Quality by Design of clinical studies
  • 3.2 Critical to Quality Factors

ISO 31000 (access liable to costs) – see in particular section

  • Risk management: Principles and guidelines
Abbreviations
  • CtoQ – Critical to Quality
  • CTU – Clinical Trials Unit
  • IB – Investigator Brochure
  • ICH GCP – International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practice
  • IMP/IMD – Investigational Medicinal Product / Investigational Medical Device
  • ISO – International Organisation for Standardisation
  • QbyD - Quality by Design
  • QMS – Quality Management System
  • SOP – Standard Operating Procedures
  • Site-INV – Site-Investigator
  • SP-INV – Sponsor-Investigator
  • TMF/ISF – Trial Master File / Investigator Site File
  • WI – Working Instructions
Concept ↦ Quality and Risk ↦ Study Feasibility ↦ Study Team Feedback
Study
Basic

Provides some background knowledge and basic definitions

Basic Monitoring
Concept

Starts with a study idea

Ends after having assessed and evaluated study feasibility

Concept Statistic Methodology
Concept Drug or Device
Development

Starts with confidence that the study is feasible

Ends after having received ethics and regulatory approval

Development Drug or Device
Set-Up

Starts with ethics and regulatory approval

Ends after successful study initiation

Set-Up Ethics and Laws
Set-Up Statistic Methodology
Set-Up Quality and Risk
Set-Up Drug or Device
Conduct

Starts with participant recruitment

Ends after the last participant has completed the last study visit

Conduct Statistic Methodology
Conduct Drug or Device
Completion

Starts with last study visit completed

Ends after study publication and archiving

Completion Drug or Device
Current Path (click to copy): Concept ↦ Quality and Risk ↦ Study Feasibility ↦ Study Team Feedback